When the expansion of the transfer pipeline was opened on May 1, 2024, on the banks of Oil MT, there was no big opening ceremony. Prime Minister Justin Tirude's Federal Government, which was bought by the project and spending more than $ 34 billion, making the pipeline one of the largest infrastructure projects ever built in Canada.

“This was something that the Liberal government did right for the oil sector … and they did not mention at all. There was no ribbon cutting ceremony, “said Rory Johnston, founder Product contextOil Market Research Service.

Even Alberta's Prime Minister Daniel Smith, a large antagonist of Trucko, thanked Federal Liberals to complete the pipeline. saying that It will be a “game-changing” alberta oil industry and raising it as an example of federal-regional cooperation.

But the liberals were severely criticized for climate lawyers, who saw this as a government that betrayed its emissions and gives oil and gas industry through greenhouse gases in the planet.

During this week, everyone seemed a distant memory in the debates of the leadership of the liberal party. Both French and English discussions, leading fronts candidates have expressed war in pipelines.

“It simply came to our notice then. It is a fact that it is possible to build a pipeline with Quebec's maritime countries.

“I am very proud to be the minister who has access to the Pacific Ocean for our energy. This diversification is an alternative for us today.

All this comes, as Canada is facing US President Donald Trump to make the 51st country of Canada and slap tariffs on Canada's export dependence on the infant's interest.

But even if the political climate becomes more favorable for new pipeline projects, they continue to continue the continuous transition to mineral fuel to clean energy.

This means that building new pipelines can make sense for Canadian energy security and politicians looking for levers because they face trump card, but may not be very attractive to private companies.

What do Canadians think about new pipelines?

Online Angus Reid Research: 2,012 Canadian, who was taken by the end of January, offers to increase the pipeline.

The Energy East, the proposal of the Western east gas pipeline, which has been canceled in 2017, its support increases by 58 to 65% since 2019, offers the request. Supporting the pipeline has reached 47 percent, even in Quebec, where a mass movement occurred against the project, when environmental issues were proposed.

Some Canadians seem to support the northern gate, the proposed pipeline, which will bring Alberta oil to BC, but it has been 2016 Donated by Trudo GovernmentA number

55% of respondents in the North Gate, which was against many native and environmental groups along its route and northern waters in northern waters, took 55% of the polls.

“People are now a kind of assimilation for alternatives. You know, how do we destroy our economy from the United States? ” Hayden Mertins-Kirkwood said, a senior researcher at the Center for Canada Policy Center.

He said that this turning point to the pipelines show a lack of political imagination, and Canada should use the moment that stimulates other industries or production with another future, leaving the removal fuel.

“There is a huge risk of tangled assets here that we continue to double, infrastructure that we will not need in the next few decades,” he said.

“Instead of building new infrastructure, we will last 100 years.”

Santa Barbaran, a professor of climate change and policy in North America, said that political tensions with the United States will talk about almost a decade that she has been a priority for almost a decade.

“I don't watch the messages we hear from Frailend and Karnie's campaigns, as it is mentioned as a matter of question,” he said.

What lessons have been learned from the Mount Trance?

The project of the TRANS and the expenses before its eyes lose any future Canadian proposals.

Texas based Kinder Morgan first offered to expand the pipeline in 2012.

But the project has faced significant protests and environmental groups along the first countries, the first countries and BC. Along the government. In 2018, Kinder Morgan stopped the project and said that it may have to fully refuse all the opposition.

Then the Trudo government entered to finish it, buying the pipeline by $ 4.5 billion and spending more billions.

“Even if it was overwhelmed by the budget, even if the pipeline itself is never violated even as an independent draft, the federal government can take broader economic images,” said the federal government.

He said that the government could take into account Alberta's long-term benefits for oil industry workers, and now to export oil to the United States.

When collected for companies using the pipeline, the energy federal regulator is going to reconsider why the project has been completed so much.

“I think we are serious about this project for the construction of the nation, we need to understand what is wrong on Mount Trans” Johnston should probably dig the mountains through the flood. He said that other pipelines may not be such precious obstacles.

Watch | Life along the extended transfer pipeline:

Pipeline road trip. How does the expansion of the Trans the Life change?

After more than a decade, the oil now flows with a $ 34 billion in Canada with a transfer pipeline. Journalist Erin Collins and CBC News Team traveled all over the route to discover how the pipeline changes in the communities that passes in the communities.

What about clean energy passage?

Over 2021The International Energy Agency, which recommends industrial countries, avoids the worst consequences of climate change, which are more frequent and severe, the world must work through net-zero emissions by 2050.

That, says means New Long Term Projects of Oil and Gas should be built.

June last year to predict that There will be a 2007 goal demand until 2029, as the production of electricity is transported to renewable sources, and electric cars become more popular.

“If the world is successful to quickly deliver the demand quickly to reach zero zero emissions, before 2050, new projects to resist high commercial risks.

“I think the Canadians will have to overcome the role of fossil fuel in the world economy, as the energy transition is going on.

“I think it is a better approach to thinking that the current American management is to think about other ways through which Canada can become energy in a way that meets climate needs.”