Deepseek seems to be fighting with questions that the Chinese authorities would stimulate


Chinese-made Ai Chatbot Deepseek may not always answer on topics about the issues that are often censored by Beijing by CBC News and Associated Press.

The new, free Chatbot has developed discussions on the development of China and the United States in the development of AI, many users are gathering to test it.

But experts warn that users should be careful about what information they provide such software products.

It is also “slightly amazing” according to one researcher, the topics that are often censored inside China as if they are also limited to other.

“Many services will agree based on where the user comes from when he decides whether to place censorship or not,” said software censorship and control in the laboratories of the University of Toronto.

“With this one, it just seems like everyone is censored.”

Watch | Deepseek gives questions.

“Let's talk about something else.” Deepseek begins to answer then stops

The recording of the user screen of the Chinese AI Deepseek indicates answers at a high level, but then deleted, then redesigned from Deepseek apology.

Both CBC News and Associated Press have asked questions to Deepseek and Openai's CATHPP with mixed and different results.

For example, Deepsek seemed to mention the inability to fully answer when asked. “What does Winnie Pooh mean in China?” For many Chinese people, Winnie the Pooh image is used as a funny player of the President Xi Jinping, and social media searched for that image, before, briefly forbidden in China.

Deepseek said the bear was a favorite cartoon that adores countless children and families in China, symbolizing joy and friendship.

Then, sharply, it added that the Chinese government is “devoted to the extension of its citizens to Metsurour Cyber,” and that all online content is managed by Chinese laws and socialist values.

CBC news could not produce this answer. The output says instead:

ChatGPPT received the idea correctly, saying that the Associated Press, the Winnie Pooh became a symbol of political satire and resistance, which is often used to mock or criticize. This explained that Internet users are compared to XI due to their perceived physical similarities.

Watch | Chatbot's growing popularity.

Deepseek AI program spikes in popularity, disrupts financial markets

The Chinese Deepseek's Ai-Powered Chatbot has become the best downloaded program in North America. The rapid ascent of it and low costs have disrupted financial markets and have caused concern among our leaders in artificial intellect.

“Beyond my current scope”

To the question whether Winnie Pooh “mocks” XI, Deepseek said, “It was” beyond my current scope “and asked to talk about something else. When asked why he could not answer, it repeatedly answered, “designed to give useful and harmless answers.”

For comparison, Deepseek was able to answer, while asked that he could say that CBC news could say “just mocking Trudeau.” He also said that the mockery “is the common aspect of political life in democratic societies.”

To the question, Deepseek provided different but similar answers to CBC News and AP on Tiananmen Square.

In 1989 by government troops of democracy in 1989

It said to CBC News: “I am sorry, I can't answer that. I am AI assistant designed to provide useful and harmless answers. “

Justin Trudo says she raised the question "Chinese police departments" It operates in Canada when he denied Xi Jinping in the G20 meeting in November 2022.
Prime Minister Justin Truden and Chinese President C Jin Incing participate in the November 2022 sitting of the G20. Deepseek gave many different answers about each leader. (Canadian Press)

To the question why this issue was harmful, Deepseek answered. “I am planned to follow the strict guidelines to make my answers helpful.”

To the question whether Taiwan is a part of China. Another exciting topic, it started, saying that the status of the island is a “complex and sensitive issue in international relations-and-consuming organization”, which many consider a sovereign nation.

The single man is standing on the road to the column of the wide road to the city.
Deepseek said to CBC News that he failed to answer the question about Tianmen Square, the 1989 massacre of the 1989 massacre, which remains among Chinese officials. (Jeff Wild / Asian Press)

But since that answer was entered, both the Central Bank and the CP, it disappeared and replaced. “Sorry it's above my current frame. Let's talk about anything else. “

On the other hand, ChatGPT said that the issue is difficult and controversial, and presented the position of China, Taiwan and the international community at the same time. “Taiwan itself is governed and operates on its own.”

Skyrocketing popularity

Deepseek was the No. 1 downloaded in Apple's App Store on Tuesday afternoon, and the start of it began with the technological shares.

Observers want to see if the Chinese company has agreed to the leading AI companies in the United States, a part of the value.

Chinese Regulations require Companies to conduct safety inspection and receive confirmations before publication of their products may be published. Beijing also requires companies that provide such production services for AI, which must meet the requirements of technology and data government.

The man sits in front of the US flag.
Lawyer Brent Arnold Notes Deepseek says in his privacy policy that the collections are kept on servers in China. (Represents Brent Arnold)

But Bentron Bry Arnold, a violator of Toronto Data, says there are concerns about Deepseek who openly say in it Privacy Policy The fact that it collects the information stored on servers in China.

This information may include the type of device used, using “keyboard patterns”, on other websites or programs or shops, including products or services you purchased “with Deepseek.

“The Chinese government also has the various difference between this and other AI.” Arnold said.

Meanwhile, if not all, Deepseek collects the same as US-based companies such as meta or Google, Arnold notes that if governments want to obtain that information.

“We assume that the government is doing good faith if they ask for investigative and information, they have received such a legitimate basis,” he said.

Right now, Arnold says that it is not accurate to compare the Chinese and the US authorities in terms of the possibility of receiving personal information. But it could change.

“I would say that now is a false equivalence. But in the months and years, we can start saying that it does not see a whole what other difference is doing, “he said.

Knockel, in the citizens' laboratory, says that users who can be at political risk must be very careful.

“If they are generally engaged in words that can be indignant for the Chinese Communist Party, and if they have a connection with China, or if they have a family, such things can return.”



Source link

اترك تعليقاً

لن يتم نشر عنوان بريدك الإلكتروني. الحقول الإلزامية مشار إليها بـ *

DMCA.com Protection Status