The US Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case from Colorado on Monday to decide whether the state and local authorities can make laws for the ban 2slgbtq + children.
The Court of Conservatory is taking the case as a result of President Donald Trump, including the prohibition of transgender people, and the Federal Gender-Processing Fund for Gender-Processes for Minors.
Justices also heard arguments in a Tennessee case Is there any government barriers to the treatment of juvenile minors? But they have not yet made a decision.
Colorado is among about half-states that prohibits experience trying to change one's sexual orientation or gender identity through consultation. The assured practice was convicted of psychology and advice in Canada and the United States.
The problem is whether the law violates the right of consultants. Defenders of such laws claim that they regulate the holding of licensed professionals by the state.
The 10th Regional Court of Appeals of the United States reviewed the State Law in Denver. The 11th Regional Court of Appeals of the United States has taken place in Atlanta on local local local public barriers.
In 2023, the court threw such a challenge, despite the federal Court of Appeal, which weighed state barriers and came to various decisions.
At that time, three justice, Samuel Aliton, Bret Cavanow and Clarance Thomas, said they would take that issue. It takes four justice to review. Nine Member Court usually does not reveal how justice votes at this stage, so it is unclear who can provide the fourth vote.
The case will be discussed within the new court period, which starts in October. Kaleada Sources Consultant The call of Kaleado's sources' council was presented to the Freedom of Defense (ADF), a conservative legal entity, which has been frequently at school in recent years.
Chile should have done to customers because of the Later, on Monday, the conference called for journalists to say that because he refused to say how many.
Chiles say that the law, in the US $ 5,000, and to suspend the license, “hinders my ability to serve my customers with integrity.”
The deputies distributed a moment of solidarity after the bill passed the bill, which prohibited the transformation therapy, a practice called to change the individual's sexual orientation.
Earlier, one of the EVER cases of ADF was a decision in 2018 that Certificate could not force California to force public licensed anti-Soviet pregnancy centers.
Child lawyers have greatly relied on the decision to address the court. They have written that Chiller does not seek to “cure” homosexual attractions to customers or “change” the sexual orientation of customers. “
In order to reject the judgment, Colorado lawyers wrote that lawmakers operate to normalize professional behavior.
Victor Sukmanki seemed to have everything. But starting after the 11th grade, he was forced to “compensated therapy” sessions, which are aimed at his homosexuality. He now moves the legislation, which “rightly turns to the transformation therapy as a way of emotional and psychological violence.”
Coupon, © 2025 mono9.xyz