Coach Stephen Edwards felt that the re-match between last Saturday's undisputed light heavyweight champion Artur Betarwive and Dimitri Bibol had to make a draw or narrow 115-113 for any person. Edwards did not understand how a judge scored it for Bibol's 8-4 (116-112).

(Credit: Mark Robinson/Macharroom Boxing)

Scorecard debate

The judges made the majority of the 12-round decision in favor of Bibhole with score of 115-113, 116-112 and 114-114.

Edwards believes that the judges did not give Better Bive (25-5, 20KO) credit for the first round, which he saw to win. In fact, the judges were banking in all the initial rounds for Bibol, which does not match the real fight. This is not just the first round. Furthermore, the judge gave Cruura a lot of rounds that he saw to lose.

If you were in a conspiracy theory to explain why a victory was given last Saturday night in the fight for 114-114 Draws as you were in the fight of 114-114, you could come up with something.

Some fans on social media believe that Bibol had an agenda for this victory because according to business, the four belts should be made more money. These reasons:

• Re -match on the Canelo Alvarez
• Eddie promoted by the horn
• David Benavidz: Mexican monsters say he likes to fight more than Betterwive
• Dajjan: Fighting on the scandal dazen

One of the things to disturb Edwards was the party's announcement team that worked on the Bitterwive vs. Bhagal 2 fight last Saturday. He felt that they had supported the whole discrimination even after the rounds of the rounds. That's what I noticed.

I had to close the word Because what they said didn't match the real fight. They all sound like a portion of the cheerleaders for the distinction. It was strange. They can say that they were in favor, not just the time to fight. Before the match began, they seemed priority towards Bibol. It is difficult for commentators to hide their bias, but the crews working in the fight have done bad things to do.

Commentary

“I do not like the way the proclaimers like what Bibol does. In the first part of the fight, Bitterwive had a good round and they showed the highlights of Bibol. The same thing happened in the first battle, “Stephen Edwards said BoxingLast Saturday night, Dazan commentators were talking about the bias that Djitri Bibol was in the fight against Arto's Betar Bive.

“I was telling myself, 'If it is near it they will give it to the distinction.' For me, there was no divorce, it was like a draw, I thought Bibol won the XI.

“The fight was in imbalance. I have no problem with 6-6, which is 114-114. 115-113 in any way I have no problem. I felt that Betarbiev had occupied the middle rounds and returned to the distinction. It was a back and front kind of things. I think Bitterbiev didn't get credit for the previous rounds, “said Edwards.

It was even a dead fight. That is why the two judges see it so much wrong and give it an irrational victory to the disappointment. The group's commentator, who is working on the broadcast, sounds like a total domination for the distinction.

“In the first round, I thought Bitterbiev won, but someone said that the split had increased by 30-27,” said Edwards. “I felt that Bitterbev might have won the first round. Not much has happened. It was probably another draw, but I thought Bitterbiev was making it a bit altogether. Then, when he (Bitterwive) cut him in the last round, I thought it was going to be 6-6 or 7-5.

“I was actually shocked to hear 116-112. No one won eight rounds, “said Edwards about Judge Mike Fitzgald, who fought 3-1 in the fight for Bibol.

“(DAZN) commentators need to be completely objective. I think many times, they are biased. I think they have an agenda. For two consecutive fights, they also consistently support Bibol with the re -playing.